So here’s a question… how come at some exhibits there is ‘no’ photography allowed? most museums I have ever attended (domestic and international), photography is allowed, just no flash. But how come some specific exhibits can not be photographed? Is it security? certain insured work that can’t be documented?
For example, Just went to the DALI exhibit at the MoMA 2 weeks ago, and I wanted to document his details for you to see, but no. no cameras allowed… I can understand no flash. but nothing at all? how is an artist suppose to document a piece for inspiration. sure, buy books, but if you are struggling? Take books out from the library? sure, then why are other exhibits allowed to be documented and others not. The only reason why I ask, is ’cause I haven’t seen much consistency with this rule… can anyone enlighten me?
ps: Salvador Dali exhibit currently at the MoMA in NYC is a great collection of his paintings, drawings and film. don’t miss it.
with technology today people can make and sell prints on the street without licensing fees. They can sell high quality prints produced a relatively inexpensive price . It seems unfair but it is an understandable point of view. many current artist also do not like having their artwork photographed without permission or unknowingly. It’s main purpose is probably licensing protection etc. Much of the income is from sales from prints, so to protect that aspect of their business, they as you to not take images and buy postcards etc.
Thank you!
Hi Maria!! hope the helped, that post was from me. I let out some words oops. Also another point, I also did not like when people came to the studio and took images without permission. Actually I really did not images taken at all. I didn’t want people to copy my work, had enough of that over at the studio I was part of. i understand when people are inspired but to completely just steal an idea or style. just uncool. BTW belated birthday wishes.
Hi! Saw a post about blogs at Fecal and figured I checked yours out. Nice! As far as photography at exhibits… Some of the works are copyrighted still (even though the artist has passed on), and with today’s technology, digital cameras etc, it’s easier than ever to take photos and create high quality prints. I’ve heard from some gallery owners that they have had instances where contemporary works were photographed (unbeknown to the gallery), printed, and sold as “official” prints on ebay. You can image what kind of problems this causes the artists and galleries. Though I myself like to take photos at exhibits, I tend to ask first. Some places are ok as long as they know what you are up to.
On another note, love the carousel photo. I do some amateur photography off and on and my two fave cameras are my Hassy and Holga also. I love the vignette effect that the Holga creates. Gives it a “frozen in memory” type of feel. Ok. Now I’m blabbing! Post more photos, would like to see what else you’ve got 🙂